Since release of my
original article Palestine Belongs to the Meek in
May 2002, the Spirit of Truth has asked me to put forth a fuller, more
complete discussion of the issues regarding Israel. After many months of
labor, this presentation has been birthed (2007). This discussion, which
has taken the form of two treatises, is particularly aimed to bring
corrective light to the Christian prophetic and intercessory movements
in their apprehension of God’s purposes among the physical people of
Israel today.
The topic of
relationship between spiritual believers in Christ, natural Jews, and
the Middle East conflict is extremely vast. It’s impossible to cover all
the bases, and there is always more to be understood. Many layers are to
be explored and penetrated—something I’ve accommodated somewhat in the
form of footnotes.1
But ultimately, I must release this treatise as a “work in progress.”
(Over the course of time, this writing will be revised as the Spirit
reveals more.)
Anyone writing about
Israel does so from a certain framework. Understanding an author’s
framework helps a reader know how to interpret a writer’s mind. To that
end, in addition to the opening Proviso, I start by offering the larger
spiritual premises that govern my understanding and the meaning of
everything else I will advance.
[Note: all scripture
quotations in this and the following treatise are taken from the New
American Standard Version, unless otherwise
noted.]
My
framework for understanding Israel rests on five premises about
spiritual things in general.
Firstly is
that, at root of the New Testament idea of “flesh” is the concept of
human lineage, heritage and culture. The core tenet of self-denial in
Christian discipleship as taught by John the Immerser, Yeshua and Paul
is to put off allegiance and affection for natural heritage (which John
the Apostle also calls “the love of the world”). This means the
Christian gospel of discipleship is trans-racial (not interracial);
and that all interpretations, teachings and prophecies regarding nations
must be held in light of this truth.
Secondly is that God’s
cosmologic purpose for mankind and creation is to use the temporal
earthly realm to bring to revelation the pre-existent eternal realm
through a process of forward development from earthly to heavenly
reality revealed across time and marked by clear dispensations. This
means that as time progresses, periodic exchanges of operations occur in
the divine plan favoring a more heavenly way, and that once an exchange
in operation has been made, God does not later revert to a previous
basis of operation in the development.
In keeping with
this, thirdly, God’s earthly
activity must be interpreted in context of His eternal purposes. God’s
actions in world affairs are secondary and supportive to transcendent
purposes that will not pass away. Therefore, the Father’s heart is not
focused on His activity among nations now, but on His end concerning men
from eternity. (The challenge of spiritual life is in learning to
partner in God’s temporal work while preserving vision for His eternal
purposes as our immovable plumb line, avoiding a shortsighted entangling
attraction to His earthside activity.)
From
these, my fourth premise is
that God’s action in time toward nations is a perishable work that only
mirrors a permanent work to
be revealed in an everlasting transnational people redeemed from this
perishable age. This people, referred to as “the elect,” is held in the
Father’s heart from before earth’s foundation—has been planted into the
field of natural mankind over the ages—will appear in God’s eternal
kingdom when it is ready to appear—and is the only people destined to receive
all God has promised regarding mankind in the ages to
come.
My
fifth premise regards the
relationship of New Covenant apostolic teaching to Old Covenant
prophecy. It is that neither Old Covenant prophecy nor New Covenant
apostolic teaching cancels out the other. However to the apostolic, not the prophetic, belongs the
authority to establish doctrinal understanding. All prophecy is subject
to the greater plumb line of apostolic revelation for interpretation.
Prophetic interpretation may not be used to contradict or supplant clear
apostolic meaning and intent.
These five premises
form my entire basis for understanding the larger Israel drama,
including:
1)
the identities of
Israel
2)
the purpose for
Israel “according to the flesh”
3)
the meanings and
relationships of the Abrahamic, Mosaic and New
Covenants
4)
heirship under these
covenants
5)
land inheritance
through these covenants
6)
the Old Covenant
prophecies of Israel’s restoration; and
7)
the meaning of
today’s divine actions toward natural Israel.
This
treatise will proceed to examine these points in depth. It will conclude
with a prophetic forward view to what the mortal nation of Israel will
look like in the glorified Millennial Age.
1
I urge serious students of these issues to read the footnotes. In many
cases the footnotes have weight critically equal to the material in the
main presentation; but I put them as footnotes only to avoid distraction
from the main flow of thought. Also, some of the footnotes are
particularly devoted to the implications of statements for the
intercessory community. Intercessors reading this teaching should give
attention to these notes.