1. The Identities of Israel
Scripture
clearly teaches the existence of two
Israels. There is a spiritual Israel as well as a natural Israel. That two
distinct Israels exist is put forth by the apostle Paul in his letters to the
Romans and Galatians.
From
the spiritual, hence eternal, perspective, Israel
is firstly the name for the everlasting people of God chosen in the Lamb from
before earth’s foundation—who will one day appear in permanent immortal glory
on a fully recreated earth. Their everlasting kingdom will be called the
Kingdom of Israel. They have and are
an everlasting city called Jerusalem, better known as New Jerusalem.
This
Israel is born from above, named from above, their city is from above, and
their kingdom will one day manifest on earth through imperishable bodies under
an eternal order. Referred to by Paul as the “Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16) and the Jews “of the heart” (Rom. 2:29), this spiritual Israel is drawn from all
natural peoples of all times. In accord with their name—which broadly
translated means, “to struggle, prevail and rule with God”—this
Israel is climactically depicted in
the Book of Revelation as God’s overcomers
in creation. In this treatise, we will refer to this people henceforth as Eternal Israel.
The second Israel is natural Israel (or “national Israel”).2
Descended from and named after the patriarch Israel (i.e., Jacob) who prevailed in struggle with an angel, this is the Israel of the present world, the Israel born from below, born of the flesh through promise to Abraham. Paul refers to this Israel as Israel “according to the flesh” (Rom 9:3; I Cor. 10:18). It is the Israel of which we all know the history so well, the Israel to and through whom the Lord of Glory came physically, and the Israel around which swirls the present controversies of the Middle East. (From the perspective of time, this is the first Israel, with the glorified Eternal Israel coming later.)Importantly,
there is no intrinsic essential
relationship of identity between these two Israels. This does not mean there is no overlap between them. They absolutely do overlap. But it is not a
guaranteed one-to-one correspondence. Speaking from the standpoint of identifying
Eternal Israel, the apostles strongly delineate the mutual exclusivity of
nature and non-universal correspondence of the two Israel identities:
For not
all who are descended from Israel are Israel. Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s
children… it is not the natural children who are God’s children
but it is the children of promise who are regarded as Abraham’s offspring. —A man is not a Jew if he is one
outwardly ... No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision
of the heart, by the Spirit—children
born not of natural descent, ... but born of God. Rom.
9:6-8;—2:28,29—Jn. 1:13 NIV
Certain
comparative points demonstrating the mutual exclusivity of the two Israel
identities comes clear through this scripture:
As
for the outworking of these identities in the body of mankind, there never was
and never will be a complete overlap between the two Israels. Many have
belonged to the second Israel-from-below who never possessed the identity of or
belonged to the first and future Israel-from-above, and vice versa.3
The
following points further help clarify the relationship of the two Israels:
The
following chart summarizes the key distinctives between the two Israels:
Natural
Israel |
Eternal Israel
|
Born of man (humanly descended) |
Born of God
(without human descent) |
Fleshly (physical and soulish) |
Spiritual (awaiting physical glory) |
National |
Transnational
(supranational) |
Manifest now and in the Age to Come |
To be manifested in the Age to Come |
First in time / Second in existence |
Second in time / First in existence |
The mutually exclusive nature of Israel’s two identities stands as the bedrock proposition from which all the other propositions of the New Testament apostles as well as of these treatises is built. The remaining burden of my writing is to accurately expound how these identities otherwise do and do not relate or overlap in God’s past, present and future purposes.5
2 The terms “natural
Israel” and “national Israel” are
used interchangeably in this treatise.
3 Scripture
uses the concept of “election” to
explain this non-overlap (Rom. 9:6-29; 11:1-6 NKJV).
4 The call to
heritage-transcendent discipleship is expressed through Yeshua’s command to “leave father and mother” and to “lose one’s life” in this world.
5 This exposition will specifically deal with the flagship
theological issue of “Replacement Theology” in the second treatise.