AN INTERPRETIVE SYNOPSIS OF THE RESTORATION PROPHECIES, CONT.
- Diffused
Image of “Sub-glorious” Return
Within
the forest of glorific restoration prophecies are sprinkled prophetic evidences
of Israel’s return which—perceived through an end times lens—run counter grain
to the substance of the dominant glorious picture. Except for a significant
section of Isaiah, these passages are largely scattered and isolated such that
they do not easily form one clear cohesive body throughout the prophets.
These
exceptional prophecies are also sketchier—more tentative and questionable in
meaning. Their flavor contrary to the glorious picture may turn on mere nuances
of interpretation or on the meaning of interpolated words that do not appear in
the Hebrew. On a whole, they appear more closely aligned with Israel’s original
sub-glorious return from Babylon in BC 538. Nevertheless, they carry an
unmistakable scent of end time application.
As
a collection, several conditions mark the return described by these prophecies:
1)
Israel’s
return is conducted in unbelief and marked by the fear of man (Isa 43:5-9;
51:12-13 );
2)
Israel
is returned under a state of appeal in which both their renewed presence in the
Land and the Lord’s blessings on it are offered them as a basis for that
appeal. (Is. 29:13-14; 43:5-44:27; 45;18-25; 46:3-13; Ezk 36:24-38);
3)
the
return occurs on more or less negatively constrained terms in which Israel is
described as being “hunted” and “fished” from the ends of the earth (Jer
16:16-17);
4)
Israel’s
repentance occurs after and/or as a result
of their return where they then remember all their evil (Jer. 31:21-23; Ezk.
11:18; 20:42-44);
5)
Though
returned, the people are still subject to the possibility of judgment by the
Lord (Jer 30:11-13; Ezk. 20:33-38);
6)
Israel’s
return occurs via transit through unspecified wilderness experience(s), one of
which is called the “wilderness of the
peoples,” and includes the sense of affliction (Isa. 43:1-4; 19-21; Jer. 31:2; Ezk. 20:34-38; Hos. 2:14-15;
Zech. 10:10-12).
·
Isaiah 43-46: A Foundation
for the Cross Current
If
this collection could be said to have an anchor, it would be Isaiah’s prophetic
exhortation in chapters 43 through 46. Beginning in 43:5-9, Isaiah describes
the return of an unbelieving people from the ends of the earth: “Bring out the
people who are blind, even though they have eyes, And the deaf, even though
they have ears.”
From
this start, the rest is an appeal to Israel—and all the nations—to acknowledge
the Lord’s supremacy above all gods and the futility of idols. The appeal is
set in context of a call for the assembling of all nations before the Lord as
if in a courtroom—something certainly suggestive of the end times.
Importantly, this part of Isaiah is fundamentally shaped around the prediction of Israel’s original return from Babylon in BC 538 (shown by chapter 45 which predicts the rise of Cyrus the Persian). And it is shaped around the unbelief of the audience he was immediately addressing.82
Significantly,
Yeshua (as we saw earlier) applied this same description of unbelief to the
Israel of His own time, and even to His own disciples (Mk. 4:12; 8:18). Paul
follows suit in Rom. 11:8-11, but also contends that, despite the unbelief,
Israel’s elect remnant remain beloved of the Lord (11:28)—perfectly agreeing
with Isaiah’s opening words in 43:1-4.
The
reason these observations are so important is that, to the degree Isaiah 43-46
contemplates another return of Israel after the BC 538 return, it cannot be regarded as a fulfillment of the
glorious regenerative picture envisioned later by Isaiah and the rest of the
dominant prophetic body. This “return under appeal” is an entirely
different spiritual class action subject to the same failings as the original
return. Thus it is a separate event.
Though it is a “return” in the reconstructive sense, it does not constitute restoration according to the Spirit’s mind.
·
Ezekiel’s Reverse Repentance
Sequence
Where
Isaiah 43-46 predicts an unbelieving return as a platform for the Lord’s appeal
to Israel, scattered passages in Ezekiel appear to show that the return and its
blessings are the means for producing (not resulting from) Israel’s
repentance—exactly opposite to the portrait in the body of glorious passages.
The basis for seeing a pre-repentance return in these verses is more open to
subjective interpretation, but is still viable.
o Ezekiel 11:18
Speaking
of Israel’s return to the Land, Ezekiel 11:18 reads, “[When] they come there, they will remove all its detestable things and
all its abominations from it.” This
can be interpreted to mean that, as a result of returning, Israel will see
their need to repent, demonstrated by their removing of all the idols they
worshipped there before. This hinges on interpreting the interpolated word “when” (which does not appear in the
Hebrew) to mean “because.” The
causality is interpretive, not translated.
The
idea of “when” could as easily be
interpreted to mean “at that time.” In that case, the verse only says that at the time Israel returns, they will
remove what remains of the idolatrous evidences from their former occupation.
This does immediately harmonize with the main portrait in which repentance
leads to restoration.
o Ezekiel 36:24-38
24 "For I will take you from the nations, gather you
from all the lands and bring you into your own land. 25 "[Then] I will sprinkle clean water on
you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and
from all your idols. 31 [Then] you will remember your evil ways and your deeds that were not
good, and you will loathe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and
your abominations. 38 Like
the flock for sacrifices, like the flock at Jerusalem during her appointed
feasts, so will the waste cities be filled with flocks of men. [Then] they will know that I am the LORD.” (Read the entire passage.)
The
word “then” throughout this passage
is compelling in showing a cause-effect relationship from restoration to
repentance. But like 11:18, it is an interpolated word, being interpreted to
mean “as a result of this.” The cause-effect perception also assumes
that the phrase “know that I am the Lord”
refers to the saving knowledge of the Lord associated with repentance.
But if the interpolation is removed, or is interpreted otherwise to mean “at that time,” and if the phrase “know that I am the Lord” is simply a testimony to the Lord’s (and of the prophet’s) veracity, then the cause-effect relationship is removed. Ezekiel is only saying that the Lord’s cleansing of Israel and His restoration of them will happen in close proximity, and these things will prove that Ezekiel’s prophecy is “of the Lord.”83
If so, this passage
too is immediately consonant with the otherwise dominant portrait of regenerative
pre-return (not post-return) repentance.
o Ezekiel 20:42-44
42 "’And you will know that I am the LORD, [when] I bring you into the land of
Israel, into the land which I swore to give to your forefathers. 43 There
you will remember your ways and all your deeds with which you have defiled
yourselves; and you will loathe yourselves in your own sight for all the evil
things that you have done. 44 [Then] you will know that I am the LORD [when] I have dealt with you for My name's sake, not according to
your evil ways or according to your corrupt deeds, O house of Israel,’ declares
the Lord GOD."
Again,
the question of interpolated meaning remains. But verse 43 offers the strongest
evidence that Ezekiel is indeed
prophesying a pre-repentance
return. This is reinforced by verses 33-39 which predict conditions of
wilderness-like duress under which the Lord will bring Israel back to its Land
“under the bond of the covenant” as a
disciplinary action.
&&&&&&&&&&
The nuanced differences in interpreting these passages show just how regenerative and non-regenerative truth can share the same prophetic space, yet refer to entirely different realities and events. Nevertheless, if we accept that Ezekiel is prophesying an end time Jewish return to the Land under adverse conditions in which the return itself is designed to produce Israel’s repentance, then we can again only conclude that, like Isaiah 43-46, these verses predict a different return than that of the glorious regenerative restoration prophesied most everywhere else. 84
·
The Crucible of Identity
Separation
Within
the heart of the sub-glorious portrait of Israel’s repatriation appears a yet
deeper counter cross current. Framed by the faithless return with its
hardships, the Lord nevertheless discerns further into the unbelieving national
body to distinctly foresee and speak to those of his electing grace who through
the hardships are destined to come forth as part of Eternal Israel in the true
restoration.
Some
verses deserve comment in this light:
When you pass
through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they will not
overflow you. When you walk through the fire, you will not be scorched, nor
will the flame burn you. Isa. 43:2
Therefore
behold, I will allure her, Bring her into the wilderness, and speak kindly to
her. Hos.
2:14
For thus says
the Lord of hosts, “After glory he has sent me against the nations which
plunder you, for he who touches you touches the apple of His eye.” Zech. 2:8
The
context of all these and similar passages is the sub-glorious return in
unbelief under adversity. It is not the return and restoration into permanent
glory under unconditional favor. The waters, fire, wilderness and plunder by
the nations in these verses all witness to this.
See
this carefully. The prophets elsewhere declare that all these larger negative
factors are applied by God against Israel’s incorrigible unbelievers to remove them as chaff and stubble. As
such, the words of favor, hope and tenderness found within this context are not
addressed to them nor apply to the nation
as a whole in its state of unbelief.
They
do apply though to the scattered
elect hidden within the unbelieving nation who also have not yet come to
restorative repentance, but—as the trials climax—will be protected through the
judgments, coming to regenerative repentance through them, and will regroup as
a transformed supra-national body to meet and be joined to Eternal Israel.
This same differentiation of the elect within the unbelieving nation applies to the prophecies of God’s vengeance on the nations for their final attack on Israel. That vengeance is in retribution for His repentant elect, not for the unbelieving national body on whose account the Lord has allowed the attacks. 85
But it takes regenerative perception to accurately
discern these things. Absent this discernment, these references to God’s
favor on His yet-to-be-redeemed elect allow for the misbelief that these
prophecies describe the actual restoration, when they do not. They are in fact pre-restorational. 86
82 Parts of other chapters after 46 (especially chapter 48) could be included in this body of “return under appeal” if Isaiah’s later exhortations to unbelieving Israel are seen as tied to the chapter 43 future return. But after chapter 46, such passages seem more clearly directed to Isaiah’s own immediate audience.
83 This passage is used to prove that modern Israel’s 20th century return and establishment is sufficient to and will precipitate Israel’s regenerative national repentance, thus enabling the equation of modern Israel with the final restoration—without contemplation of any future final crushing, dispersal and subsequent return. But if this were so, then Israel’s “remembrance of their evil ways,” their repentance, their sprinkling of heart and their knowing of the Lord should all have been secured by now. For if the interpolated “then” is directly causal, then the repentance supposed to be caused by the said evidences (the return, abundant agriculture and repopulating of the waste cities—vss. 24, 30, 34-38) should have come into manifestation when the evidences first appeared. Indeed, these evidences have now been manifest for over 70 years. Yet the Lord still has not been proven holy among Israel in the sight of the nations, the nations do not recognize that the Lord has planted Israel, and Israel still does not “know the Lord.” Thus the direct causal interpretation fails on the evidence.
84 The reverse order interpretation
of restoration contemplated in these three passages runs counter to Ezekiel’s
own first stated sequence in 6:8-10 where he clearly prophesies Israel will
recognize their evil and repent in the lands of their scattering ahead of their return.
85 This explains the paradox between all the prophecies that say the nations have been ordained as instruments of judgment against Israel and those that say God will avenge Israel because of the attacks of the nations. Compare e.g., Jer. 25:9; 27:6; 43:10 with 51:24, 34-36.
86 Passages as these allow the unbelieving nation at-large to continue wallowing in self-absorption under a vain imagination of God’s pleasure with them on a carnal basis—which then apply them as evidences to bolster their reconstructive aspirations.