7. Accurately Interpreting
Today’s Divine Actions Regarding Natural Israel
Undeniably,
God has for over a century stirred in the Jewish heart (and prodded the Gentile
nations through various exigencies) to lead the Jews back to the Middle East.
Yet we’ve fully proven that, 1) the covenantal record dictates this return
can’t be about inheriting the Promised Land (the Land title has been
transferred to Eternal Israel, the Jews remain subject to the Gentiles, and “flesh and blood cannot inherit” the
Promised Land); and 2) today’s events fail to fulfill the prophecies of
glorified restoration.
If
all this is so—if the Lord is still not at this time “restoring the kingdom to Israel”—then what is He doing?? How can we
reasonably understand His Mind behind the massive 20th century
repatriation? This is the last—and perhaps most important—question I must
answer.
- The Concept
of Pre-Restoration
As
intimated already, the only credible prophetic evidence we have for
scripturally identifying modern Israel’s regathering is the body of cross-grain
prophecies that allow for a separate sub-glorious return short of real
restoration. In reconciling this sub-glorious portrait to the one of true
restoration, we determined that, while the two returns are not identical, they
are joined; and that the sub-glorious return must occur ahead of the true
restoration.
As
a connected action ahead of true restoration, today’s Jewish repatriation can
best be described as an “ante-restoration”
or—given natural Israel’s role as a mirror of Eternal Israel—a “shadow restoration.” In this treatise,
we will call it The Pre-restoration.
The
Pre-restoration prophecies provide valuable clues for giving us the Lord’s Mind
behind the modern return. Three elements stand out from this collection. They
are that:
1)
Israel’s
return occurs in unbelief.
2)
Israel’s
return occurs as a divine disciplinary
action under semi-forced conditions of hardship.
3)
Israel’s
return occurs under divine appeal in
which the return with both its blessings and hardships serves as a platform for
conducting that appeal.
Isaiah
43, the best “spokesman” for the entire collection, encapsulates these
conditions, centering on verses 8 and following:
1 But now, thus says the
LORD, your Creator, O Jacob, And He who formed you, O Israel, "Do not
fear, for I have redeemed you; I have called you by name; you are Mine! 2 "When you pass through the waters, I
will be with you; And through the rivers, they will not overflow you. When
you walk through the fire, you will not be scorched, Nor will the flame
burn you. 5 "Do not fear, for I am with you; I will bring your
offspring from the east, and gather you from the west. 6 "I will say
to the north, 'Give {them} up!' And to the south, 'Do not hold {them} back.'
Bring My sons from afar and My daughters from the ends of the earth, 8 Bring out the people who are blind, even though they have eyes, And
the deaf, even though they have ears. 9 All the nations
have gathered together so that the peoples may be assembled. Who among them can
declare this and proclaim to us the former things? Let them present their
witnesses that they may be justified, or let them hear and say, "It is
true." 10 "You are My witnesses," declares the LORD,
"And My servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe Me
and understand that I am He. Before Me there was no God formed, and there will
be none after Me. 22 "Yet you have not called on Me, O Jacob; but you
have become weary of Me, O Israel. 25 "I, even I, am the one
who wipes out your transgressions for My own sake, And I will not remember your
sins. 26 "Put Me
in remembrance, let us argue our case
together; State your {cause,} that you may be proved right….
Pre-restored
Israel is an unbelieving Israel
brought back under trial—an Israel
with which God is pleading—as one Who
brings a court case. (Note Isaiah’s
use of the words “witnesses” and “case.”) Verse 9 further indicates that
God’s plea ultimately involves the summoning—as if by “subpoena”—of all nations
together. All the earth is to become a “courtroom” for a divine pleading
centered on Israel in the Land called Palestine / Israel.
This
concept of legal pleading becomes the
grounding reference for our understanding God’s true purpose behind the
Pre-restoration.
- Return to
“Square One:” Recreating the Scene of a Crime
Depending on the nature of a court trial, one thing that may be required is to replicate the scenario in which key events occurred. This can happen on the floor of the courtroom using models, staging techniques and expert witnesses. But in rarer cases, it may be necessary for a court to convene at the actual scene of an event. This can be especially true in the case of a crime such as a murder. We call this “returning to the scene of the crime.”27
This has every application
to the Jewish repatriation in the context of Isaiah 43.
The
immediate effect of the Jews’ return—the return of an unreconciled people
accomplished through trial of “fire and water”—has been to forge them once more
into a cohesive national body. Isaiah 43 would have us see this national
re-formation as the convening of a divine court. The Jewish return is really
about the Lord’s summons (subpoena) of Israel for the conducting of a legal
hearing.
Isaiah
clarifies the purpose of this hearing. It is the Lord’s entry into litigation
with Israel over His rightful claim upon them (“You are mine,” He says in 43:1). Seen through regenerative eyes,
the focus of this litigation is the issue of the Son and His rightful
claim on them by right of New Covenant redemption (“I have redeemed you.”)
But
that is not all. The Lord is not just bringing Israel back to the Land for
litigation. As the chosen venue for
convening this court, God is also using the Promised Land as a staging ground to forensically re-create the
scene of Israel’s ancestral rejection of His Son.
More
thoughtful consideration of today’s realities shows us that Israel’s return
actually “returns” them back to “square one” at the opening of the New
Testament. It takes them up from the “basement” of diaspora back to visible
“ground level” as a fleshly nation. But
that is all. Natural Israel has been “restored” only in the sense of coming
back to where they were historically at
the time they refused the Messiah.
When
Yeshua last presented His claims to Israel nationally, she was under Roman
oppression. Today, she is under dominion of the United Nations.28
But restoration to a place under Gentile dominion is not what the prophets
promised! Therefore, the present return can only be seen as God’s placement or positioning of the Jews for “picking
up” of where He “left off” with them in making His New Covenantal claims on
them.
To
this day the Jewish people remain subject to the covenantal shift that has
governed all men since Calvary. Their time set aside has never exempted them
from the gospel demands first issued them as a nation.29
Israel must still enter all the New Covenantal surrenders required by Yeshua before the Jewish people can be
regeneratively restored to share heirship of the Land. Nothing about their
merely re-convening on the site of the Promised Land changes, circumvents or
nullifies this.
Since
the requirements have not changed, yet God has brought them back to the Land,
then God’s purpose for this return can only
be for setting a stage on which to revisit His original gospel demands upon the
Jews as a unified people.
From
the totality of this vantage, we can easily see that Israel’s summons back to
the Promised Land has absolutely nothing
to do with their inheriting of the Land. Not yet. God is summoning Israel to a
Divine Court of Claims,
specifically, His claim on them. He is not summoning them to a Divine Court of Probate for proving their
right of claim to the Land based on
the Last Will and Testament of Moses (as is so popularly believed now).30
·
Forensic
Re-Staging: the Unbelief Factor
It
requires zero discernment to see that modern Israel has been re-fashioned in
unbelief. What does take discernment is to see the significance of that
unbelief in terms of the restoration prophecies and to rightly appropriate that
perception to identify God’s real purpose in repatriating an unbelieving nation
back to the Land.
We’ve
just advanced that not only is modern Israel’s return a fulfillment of Isaiah
43:8, but that more fully it forensically re-creates the original stage on
which Israel rejected Yeshua. That this is so is ultimately clinched by
Yeshua’s own original application of Isaiah’s prophesy to the people of His
day:
Mt. 13:13-14 Therefore I
speak to them in parables, because while seeing they do not see, and while
hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. And in their case the
prophecy of Isaiah is being fulfilled…
The
relationship between Yeshua’s word to Israel here and modern Israel’s return in
fulfillment of this same prophecy is critical to proving the truth about
today’s return. Yeshua’s application to Israel past tells us that any future
return of the Jews contemplated by Isaiah 43 must necessarily find that
generation defined by the same unbelief
as the generation to whom Yeshua first came.
If
so, and if Isaiah 43 applies to today’s return, then everything true about
Yeshua’s heart toward unbelieving Israel of His day defines what is true about His heart toward unbelieving Israel today.
It means that Israel today is subject to the same mind, the same attitude, the
same discriminations of heart from which Yeshua first spoke to Israel—including
the same appeals to repentance and the
same reproaches for unbelief.
Not
only all this, but to top it off—the joint application of Isaiah 43 to Israel
past and present means that whatever was true about Israel’s conditions
vis-à-vis restoration in Yeshua’s
time is what must also be true of them
today.
In
their unbelieving state at Yeshua’s first coming, Israel was not considered
restored even though they occupied the Land. Israel did not consider herself restored. Every Pharisee, priest
and prophet was still looking for Israel’s restoration. If so at that time,
then neither under today’s forensically re-created conditions of the past can
Israel now be considered “restored.”
·
Reconstructionist
Unbelief: Fulfilling Isaiah 43:8
The
reconstructionist mindset on the part of today’s Jews—including so many Messianic
believers in Yeshua and even increasingly those from Gentile-origined
churches—is but evidence of the very
unbelief predicted in Isa. 43:8.
The prophetic mischaracterizing of modern events and Israel’s condition conducted through the reconstructionist agenda itself reinforces the proof that modern Israel’s return fulfills what the sub-glorious—not the glorious— prophecies predict: the return of an unbelieving people unable to hear regenerative truth, rejecting of the calls by regenerative apostles and prophets to repentant heritage denial and transcendent spiritual thinking.31
In
this way, Jewish and Messianic reconstructionist unbelief is self-fulfilling of the unbelief
associated with the sub-glorious picture of Pre-restoration. The reconstructionists
of Messianic Judaism are indeed participating in the fulfilling of end time
prophecy, but not the prophecy they think they are fulfilling!32
Nevertheless,
using that unbelief for His own ends, God is sovereignly allowing the Jews to
re-create the scene of the crime over which He is calling them—and in turn the
world—to come to a final verdict.
&&&&&&&&&&
Having established that
modern Israel’s return is not their restoration, but their forensic reconvening
under divine appeal, we can move to study the nature of the “Plaintiff’s” plea
in depth.
27 This used to happen more often in “Perry Mason” thrillers, but still happens today. Consider this recent example as published in the San Bernardino (CA) County Sun of August 4, 2006:
Court convenes at scene
Jurors visit areas of three slayings
[name withheld],
Staff Writer
San Bernardino County Sun
Jurors in the murder
trial of [name withheld] took an unusual trip Thursday and visited the
locations where three men lost their lives and three others were wounded.
Flanked by
law-enforcement officers, San Bernardino Superior Court Judge [name withheld]
donned his black judicial robe and convened court at three locations in Colton
and San Bernardino, including the infamous apartment complex known as The
Yellows.
Jurors huddled
together at each location, standing alongside the attorneys in the case, while
[the judge] announced the proceedings for the official court record. The jurors
then were free to peruse the surroundings, weigh proximity and distances, peer
through windows and doors to inspect the locations up close.
For prosecutor [name withheld], the visitation was the
second time in her career that she participated in such a proceeding. Defense
attorney [name withheld] last participated in an in-field viewing in
1988…
28 The creature owes its servitude to its creator.” The myth persists that Israel is a sovereign state. But Israel was created by UN resolution, not by the Jews’ own self-determination and definitely not by the Word of God as under Moses. The UN authored laws which Israel was obliged to write into their constitution in exchange for world recognition. In their 1948 Declaration of Independence, the Jews proclaim their sovereignty, just as they did to Yeshua. But as then, so now, they remain under Gentile dominion and can basically do little without world approval.
29 The idea that
a “dual covenant” situation exists whereby natural Israel is to be treated
“separately” in God’s sight regarding the gospel is a total spiritual
fabrication of men with zero apostolic support.
30 Probate of the Promised Land Estate has already been settled in favor of Eternal Israel.
31 This writing with its
challenge to Reconstructionist thinking in effect belongs to the Spirit of
pleading on account of which Israel has been disciplinarily repatriated. Using
our legal illustration, these treatises regarding Israel—as well as all the
prophetic writings of others to this effect—may be considered as “briefs” submitted on behalf of the
Plaintiff.
32 From this incidental perspective, the human reconstructing
of Old Testament conditions now being undertaken can be said to be “of the Lord”— in the same way anything
conducted in unbelief that furthers His purpose (like the crucifixion or the
prophecy of Caiphas) can be said to be “of
the Lord.” But it is only in this incidental in-spite-of-itself sense that
these human aspirations and activities can be so identified.