THE PROBLEM OF MESSIANIC JUDAISM
PART 18
A TRAIL OF MESSIANIC ISSUES, CONT.
4. The Meaning of the
Restored / Fulfilled Torah
- Jeremiah’s
Prophecy of the Restored Torah
Messianics
believe God will restore the Mosaic Torah. In what is perhaps their premier
prophecy-based issue, they particularly draw on Jeremiah’s prophecy (31:33)
that the Lord will “write His law (torah)
on their hearts” to prove an inherent oneness between the New and Old
Covenants. The apparent meaning of this prophecy is that the Lord will write
the Law of Moses on the heart of the New Testament believer in Christ.
But again, according
to the Spirit of regeneration, the obvious
conclusion drawn about a prophecy’s meaning is not necessarily the true or
intended conclusion to be drawn.
Serious problems exist with the conclusion that the New Covenant torah written
on our hearts is the Torah of Moses.
First of all,
Jeremiah himself tells us that the future covenant
to be made with the people is “not like” the covenant made with the
forefathers (31:32). This means the Torah to be written on the heart is not
like the Mosaic Torah and therefore cannot
be the Mosaic Torah.
Why? It is because
the old covenant and the Law are the same.
The Law was the essence and embodiment of the Old Covenant such that the two
are identified as one. The Law is repeatedly referred to as “the book of the Covenant.” Therefore, as
the future covenant to be made is entirely unlike the first covenant, so the
Torah to be written on the heart can only be a new Torah entirely unlike the
Mosaic Torah.
Second, Paul’s teachings
contradict the notion. If Jeremiah’s prophecy refers to the Mosaic Torah, Paul
could never have asserted that believers are “no longer under” the law, are “dead”
to the law, are “freed” from the law,
etc.—all of which oppose the Messianic interpretation of Jeremiah’s meaning.
Paul could not have spent the bulk of his ministry disproving the believer’s
direct connection to a Torah that Jeremiah’s prophecy intended to establish in
our hearts.
Paul knew
the Hebrew scriptures better than anyone. He wrote in full knowledge of
Jeremiah’s prophecy. Yet he made his statements about the Law in spite of it.
This means he had to know that the “obvious” meaning of Torah in Jeremiah’s prophecy was not the correct meaning. He knew
that Jeremiah’s New Covenant Torah (Gk: “Nomos”) to be written in our hearts did not and could not refer to the Torah
of Moses.
To what then is the “torah” in Jeremiah referring? What is the torah to be written on the heart of the New Covenant believer? The Spirit through Paul tells us that Yeshua, as the “end 51
of the Torah” (Rom 10:4), is Himself the Torah to be written on our hearts:
Forasmuch as you are manifestly declared to be the
epistles of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink,
but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in
fleshly tables of the heart. II
Corinthians 3:3
Paul’s words here
exactly track Jeremiah’s prophecy! Moreover, not only does Paul cite Christ as the Torah written on our heart, he specifically disavows the idea of the Mosaic Torah by contrasting Christ to the
tables of stone. If Jeremiah’s prophecy referred to the Torah of Moses,
Paul would have not made this contrast, but would have affirmed here the
“essential oneness” between the Torah and the New Covenant as Messianics put
forth.
The same truth is
revealed in Hebrews which makes two references to the Jeremiah prophecy (Heb
8:7-13 & 10:16-17). In both contexts, they are contrasts to the Torah of Moses and the Old Covenant, not affirmations of it.
Third, when we read
other New Testament descriptions of the Law of Christ written on the heart,
writer after writer refers to it as the Law of Love. This fits with Yeshua’s
word that the entire Torah is fulfilled in the Law of Love (“on this hang all the law and the prophets.”)
Even James echoes by saying the Torah is fulfilled in the royal law of love,
alias the law of liberty.
Paul, Peter and John
perpetually speak of agape love itself, never “the Torah,” as the measuring
stick of all faith and practice. If as Messianics claim the Torah is somehow
still the direct measuring stick consciously written on our hearts, all these
writers would have said so. They do not. And they do all this—as Jews—in full knowledge of the Old Covenant
prophecies of the restoration of the Torah.
Fourth, like the
truth of Gentile engrafting, the New Covenant “torah written on the heart” must
be an already established reality in
the church since the New Covenant’s inception 2000 years ago. The Covenant could not have been established
without its torah. Therefore it is not a torah yet to be “restored,” but one
abundantly evident in the church everywhere in every believer from the beginning. The question then is, does the
Mosaic Torah fit this description?
Except for a
prevalent awareness of the Ten Commandments in the hearts of most believers worldwide, there is very
little awareness of the overall Mosaic Torah in the heart of the average New
Covenant believer. And even those believers who advocate return to the complete
Torah must study diligently to be aware of all it says, and even then can’t
remember all its details!
Beyond this, while
knowledge of the Ten Commandments is prevalent in literate societies, some parts
of the world have received only the gospel message, do not have the Scriptures,
and have never heard of the Ten Commandments. These believers know only Christ and the law of agape.
The general worldwide
ignorance of the larger Mosaic Torah by all except the most scholarly (and the
Messianics), and the fact that some believers in Yeshua in the world have
virtually no knowledge of the Torah at all, proves that the Torah God said He
would write on the heart of the New Covenant believer cannot be the Mosaic
Torah.
&&&&&&&&&&
What then about the
prophecies that say that in the glorified age, the “Law will go forth from Jerusalem?”
As observed at the
end of the first treatise, “in that day and at that time,” the Law will be the
very dictates of Yeshua Himself as the One True Lawgiver. It will be the Living
Law in glorified flesh to which the Mosaic Torah pointed. But it will not be
the Mosaic Law. At that time, the entire human relationship to “law” will be
entirely regenerated, and will not have the appearance of what has been
recognized as law in the preceding ages, either under Moses or under Gentile
mismanagement of the New Covenant.
Messianics
are correct to emphasize the unified consistency
of the word of God across the ages. But that cross-age consistency may not
legitimately be interpreted to prove an intrinsic
oneness of the covenants by which the
word is expressed. The Word of God is one, yes. But our relationship to it, first through the Torah, then later
directly through Christ, the Living Logos-Word, is not one.
The
first relationship was abolished and replaced by the second for all peoples of
all times and lineages. That is the only reason for two covenants at all (Heb.
8:7). If this is not so, then the New Covenant must be rejected, for this is
what it claims about itself. All who claim to believe in Christ, be they of
Gentile or Jewish origin, are deceived to believe they can embrace the New
Covenant while reinterpreting it to believe they can still embrace the Old
Covenant as well.52
NEXT
– PART 19: YESHUA’S EXHORTATION ON THE LAW’S FULFILLMENT
51 The word “end” in Rom. 10:4 has three meanings in Paul’s
understanding:
{Note:
it does not say Christ is the
termination of the Torah itself. He
was not. He Himself said he did not
come to destroy the law. Paul also said that faith does not “abolish” the law,
but strengthens it. But it’s not the Torah that is at issue, rather our relationship to it between
the covenants. Our direct relationship
to the Torah has been abolished. The Torah did not die. But we died to it. This is a critical difference
Paul has a hard time making for us, but we must grasp it.}
As the objective, the
fulfillment and the termination of covenant with the Mosaic Torah, Christ Himself must be the Torah written
on our hearts. This can be the only
meaning of Jeremiah’s prophecy, if the New Covenant writers are to be believed
when they declare our terminated relationship with the Torah.
That Christ Himself
is the Torah written on our hearts is also confirmed by supportive testimony of
the New Covenant writers. For instance, John tells us that Christ is the Logos,
ie, the Word. The “Word” (Grk, Logos)
is the Divine Creative Essence that precedes
the Torah and from which the Torah came as a lesser subsidiary revelation.
Looking again to the
beforeness of Christ, as Yeshua said, “Before
Abraham was I am,” so as the Logos it can be said of Him, “Before the Torah was, I AM THE WORD.”
Christ then as the pre-existent WORD is the superior “torah written on the
heart.”
52 A post very relevant to this issue was recently offered on a
prophetic discussion list. In it, the writer brought up the overlooked “torah”
of Abraham (Gen. 26:5) as distinguished from the Torah of Moses—to demonstrate
a valid connection between the New Covenant and a Torah referred to in the Old
Covenant, but not the Torah of Moses itself. I offer that discussion here
without further comment, except to say that the Abrahamic Torah as described by
the writer is consistent with the Torah Jeremiah refers to being written on the
heart:
Torah is a word that means law,
direction, instruction. The first 5 books of the Bible are usually
referred to as The Torah; not just the sections where Moses wrote down all of
the precepts God gave to him at Mt. Sinai. It is my personal belief that
God gave these to Moses for the people because they openly stated that they
didn’t want God to speak with them and lead them personally; like He was doing
with Moses, and many others before him.
We know the Word tells us that God
made an eternal covenant (one without end) with Abraham and His Seed centuries
before He made the above temporary covenant with the Hebrews at Mt.
Sinai. Galatians teaches us that the covenant God made with Abraham is
the same New Covenant that has now been restored to us through the Lord Jesus
Christ (the Seed God was referring to; which was to come and now
has).
Notice what the Father says
concerning Abraham; centuries before God gave a set of detailed precepts to
Moses for the people who refused His offer of personal relationship:
Gen 26:5 - “Because that
Abraham obeyed My Voice, and kept My Charge, My Commandments, My
Statutes, and My Laws (Torah).”
God says, in Genesis, that Abraham
kept His Law (Torah). Seeing as this was spoken centuries before God gave a set
of detailed Laws (instructions) to Moses.....what Torah (instructions) do we
think God may be referring to? The answer is simple and I believe found
within the above verse: Abraham obeyed God’s Voice. In other words
God’s Torah, law, direction, or instruction was whatever God happened to be
telling Abraham to do or say at any given moment. Sound familiar?
Jesus told us that He only did what He saw the Father doing, and only said what
He heard the Father saying.
We can all read the account of
Abraham’s life and his relationship with God and see what some of God’s
specific instructions (laws) to Abraham were. However, the point is that
His laws (instructions) were not precepts “set in stone”, but they varied
throughout Abraham’s lifetime, and were a result of an ongoing personal relationship
between God and Abraham. We can also read a list of OT saints who lived
this same relationship of faith in and with God; (listening and obeying His
personal instructions to them); in Hebrews 11.
One thing these Hebrew 11 saints
have in common is that God’s instructions (Torah, laws) to each one of them
were different and varied. They were not the same, or one list for all,
as some would have us believe.
Religion and all its many “set in
stone” precepts is simply another way than the Way we were created to relate
with our God. Mankind has spent centuries replacing the simplicity of a
personal relationship with God with an ever-changing, increasing list of
fleshly instructions (laws). Thank God He will not allow us to be blinded
by this wrong way of thinking any longer.
Abraham simply believed that God
was with him, and that He would speak to him, lead him, teach him,
etc...Because Abraham believed God was with him; he looked to God for
instruction, and obeyed whatever instructions (laws) God gave to him. In
this way of listening, hearing, and obeying...Abraham kept God’s charge, His
commandments, statutes, and His Laws (Torah, instructions). His life
describes the life of a believer who lived and moved and had his being in the
One who created us all.
Go back even further in the
Torah. Didn’t God always give commandments and laws (instructions); even
in the Beginning? Eat of every tree in the Garden, but do not eat of this
one, take dominion of everything, and go forth and multiply. God’s Laws
(instructions) are whatever He is speaking to YOU personally at any given time,
not a list that you can follow.
One last thought: God Himself
is the Law (Torah). The Torah Himself now dwells within mankind. Is
this not the meaning of Him telling us that His Laws are NOW written upon our
hearts and minds? It is impossible to even know His Laws
(instructions), let alone obey them, without first listening to the Law
dwelling within us. Anything done outside of moment-to-moment
obedience to the indwelling Voice (Law) of God is simply fleshly works;
which we are told do not please God.
Hopefully seeing this topic from
this perspective will help someone to realize that the Living Torah now dwells
within each and every one of us. He is the Living Word who desires to
instruct (direct) each individual in the Way He desires for them to go.