[HOME]
[INDEX OF ARTICLES
] [ COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
] [ ABOUT US ] [CONTACT
] |
THE PROBLEM OF MESSIANIC
JUDAISM
PART 12
THE
BATTLE FOR YESHUA’S IDENTITY TODAY:
THE
“RESTORATION” OF MESSIANIC JUDAISM
…Until
today.
Now,
in
our generation, at the end of the end times, Messianic
Judaism has made a sudden explosive comeback, almost as if
out of nowhere.
But
it
is not out of nowhere. Messianism’s resurgence is directly connected to the Isaiah 43:8 rise of the State of Israel.
In the first treatise, we saw how modern Israel’s
re-establishment is actually a restaging
of historic Israel’s state of unbelief at the time Yeshua
first came.
What
we
want to see in this treatise is that Messianic Judaism’s
resurgence is part of
that unbelieving re-enactment. Just as Israel has been
“restored” to its cohesive state of unbelief, so has
Messianic Judaism been “restored” in its singularly
unbelieving human vision of Yeshua. (Shared unbelief
is in fact what explains the great affinity between
Messianic believers and the State of Israel.)
- A Conflict
Re-ignited
And
so
also therefore, just as modern Israel’s contention with the
nations under unbelief has been “restored,” so has
Messianism’s conflict with the pure New Testament faith and
the larger Gentile-origined body of Christ been reignited
under unbelief.
As
shown
in the first treatise, modern Israel is in a “pre-born” state ahead of its true
regeneration. Messianic Judaism is an integral part of that
“pre-birth.” It is a “pre-restored” partial faith in Yeshua
that actually serves as the leading edge of Israel’s eventual
true conversion. It is a “first phase fruit” of the Lord’s
purpose for pre-restoring Israel toward manifest national
regenerative salvation. Messianics are the seed of a
transcendently saved national generation yet to come. And to
that degree, the Messianic movement is a genuine work of the
Lord.
But
as
a phase that only leads
to complete salvation, Messianism is a “half-way
salvation.” As a “pre-born faith” still blind to Yeshua’s
Transcendence, Messianism remains at enmity with the New
Testament gospel of Paul, and subject to the same perverting
influence of Pharisaic “viperism” as the original church in
Jerusalem.40
Eventually,
through
sharing Israel’s tribulations to the end, Messianism will come
to complete conversion, becoming the fulfillment of Israel’s
regenerative national restoration. It is under the final
crisis of “Jacob’s Trouble” that the age-long unresolved
Messianic conflict will become resolved as Messianics at last
awaken to the futility of defending a carnal heritage and
surrender it to the returning Transcendent Son of God.41
But
until
that happens, ministry that stands up to reconstructionist
blindness is necessary for leading Messianics to the same
heritage-transcendent perfection of faith to which Paul, Peter
and John all came—if by any means they may obtain it before
having to become embroiled in Armageddon. That is the saving purpose of
this treatise as we move on to study the most common
scriptural points of Messianic conflict.
There
are
three broad camps of Messianics today just as there were in
the early church. There are “pre-born” Messianics who have
never come to a true spiritual knowledge of Yeshua though
they are devoted to Him humanly. These are akin to those who
“believed” in Yeshua during His ministry, but only so far as
it “filled their stomachs.”
Then
there
are truly spirit-reborn but immature Messianics whose growth
in Yeshua is hindered by their continuing human vision and
devotion to Him. These simply believe the New Covenant must
be reconstructively restored to the Jewish legal heritage,
though not for salvation. They occupy the seat of Peter
before he had matured in his transcendent vision, and of
James who never matured into transcendence.
The
third
camp comprises the poisonous damnable Messianics whose
attachment to Yeshua’s humanity is such that they believe
reconnection of the New Covenant to the Jewish legal
heritage is mandatory for salvation. These occupy the seat
of the pharisaic Messianics that fought Paul and intimidated
the immature reborn Messianic apostles under their influence
in Jerusalem.
Going
forward, this treatise is addressed only to the arguments
of the sincere but religiously deceived, immature, reborn
Messianics for the purpose of perfecting their faith. (It
may incidentally speak to pre-born Messianics who have not
truly come to a saving surrendered spiritual knowledge of
Yeshua, though they think they have.) But it is not
written to contend with Pharisees.
Messianism’s
underlying theme is the importance of that which is born of
the flesh. It attaches that importance to its view of
Yeshua, whom Messianics see as uniquely “one of their own.”
As we’ve seen, this human attachment to Yeshua has
everything to do with Messianism’s devotion to the Mosaic
Law and Jewish culture. It’s not possible to understand
Messianism’s difficulty relating to the Gentile origined
church without grasping this.
In theory,
the love for Yeshua/Jesus by all believers should bring
harmony to the whole body of Christ. But it brings only
limited harmony between Messianic and non-Messianic
believers because each sees Yeshua through different eyes.
Specifically, each sees Yeshua through the eyes of His
different parents, parents who are from different worlds.
Where pure New Covenant believers see Yeshua only through
the eyes of His heavenly Father, Messianics see Him
primarily through the eyes of His earthly mother.
Due to their proximity to Yeshua by human lineage, Messianics
are “too close” to Yeshua naturally to see Him as the Father
(and the rest of the spiritual non-Messianic church) sees
Him. That human closeness veils their vision of Him, just as
it did James and those remaining under the Jerusalem cloud.
They see Yeshua’s eternal Sonship only within the “womb” of
their familial devotion to Him, subjecting all sense of His
divinity to His humanity. Messianics essentially see Yeshua
as Mary saw Him before
the “sword” that “divides soul from spirit” had “pierced her
own soul” and she had to realize He was no longer “hers.”
·
The
New Covenant as “Wayward Child”
Seeing
Yeshua
“through His mother’s eyes” explains why Messianics see the
New Covenant as “born from” and still intricately connected
to the Jewish legal covenantal heritage. They don’t
recognize the separated transcendence of covenant Yeshua
effected when He was fully declared the Son of God, born
from the dead (Rom. 1:4)—forever leaving behind His human
identity rooted in Judaism.
But
founded
only on Yeshua’s rebirth
from the dead, the New Covenant did not come out of
the “womb” of the Old Covenant. It was born with Yeshua out
of the womb of the grave of His own “death to the Law.” It
was born at the place where Yeshua
died
to His mother—there to become its own self-standing
heavenly-origined Covenant, unfettered to the old, bringing
forth a new Life descended only
from God, not even partly from man under the Law.
Today, the
divine sonship based New Covenant has lived for 2000 years,
however imperfectly among the nations. It is now a very
“old” or “elder” covenant in its own right—“old” in the
sense of mature, not outdated to be replaced. But Messianic
Judaism does not recognize that eldership. Rather, it sees
this two ages-old Covenant the way Mary saw Yeshua away from
her influence—as a “wayward child” in need of return to its
mother. As Nicodemus asked, “Can
a
man return to his mother’s womb when he is old?”
Messianism’s answer respecting the New Covenant’s departure
from Judaism is erroneously “yes.”42
·
Messianic
Rationale
So it is
Messianics argue their case for return to the Jewish legal
heritage (as well as for unconditional political support of
the State of Israel) through the “Mary veil.”43
This veil accounts for an otherwise
spiritually illogical rationale that drives Messianic thought
and zeal (—for instance, why Messianics can both passionately
advocate adherence to Mosaic Law and yet believe they are
living “by faith.”)
If one
understands the Mary veil, he has all he needs to see through
Messianism’s scriptural assertions regarding the Law and
Jewish heritage. To read any further is unnecessary.
Nevertheless, for the benefit of seekers after specific
answers to Messianic issues, this treatise
continues—addressing many of Messianism’s most common
fallacies.
NEXT
–
PART 13: MESSIANIC RESPONSE TO
PAUL & THE LETTER OF HEBREWS
40 My use of the term pre-born
faith is carefully chosen, derived from Paul’s
word to the Galatians, “My little children, of whom I
travail in birth again until Christ be formed in
you, I desire to be present with you now, and to
change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you.” (4:19-20 KJV). The truth is
that as long as faith is harnessed to a human vision
of Yeshua, there is doubt as to whether the
transcendent life of new birth has indeed come forth
in the spirit. I
am not saying that Messianics are not born
again. I am
saying (as is Paul) that as long as one’s vision of
Yeshua is through the veil of devotion to His human
heritage, it can signify either a pre-born state of
faith or an immature state of truly reborn faith,
making it difficult to tell whether one is truly
born again. Indeed, many Messianics are not born
again (just as many professing evangelical
Gentile-origined believers are not born again) but
are in a pre-born state of faith. However, I
unhesitatingly say with Paul that all Pharisaic
Messianics, that is, Messianics who mandate
salvation in Yeshua be connected to the Jewish legal
heritage in any manner are not born again and are
promoting a counterfeit gospel under damnation.
41 By including himself as an example of the remnant Jews
God has not cast away (Rom. 1:1) Paul makes it clear
that the final turning of the remnant Jews he predicts
(11:26) will be according to the standard of his
own transcendent faith and message. The
Messianic movement therefore does not meet the
criteria of the turning of the Jews Paul has
predicted. Theirs can only be regarded as a partial
pre-turning.
42 Now in
truth, as Paul observes, the Old Covenant served as a
guardian of the New Covenant life until the New was
ready to be revealed. And in a spirit of “honor
thy guardian,” it is proper to respect the Old
Covenant context out of which Yeshua was humanly born
and His New Covenant historically emerged. But in the
Spirit of truth, it is utterly improper to imagine the
re-subjecting of the New Covenant to the Old, as if it
had been born by descent from it and was meant to
remain somehow “tied to its ‘mother’s’ apron
strings.”
43
The
astute reader will by now have recognized the exact
parallel between the Messianic Mary veil and the Mary
veil of Roman Catholicism. Roman Catholicism is based
on the same humanistic view of Jesus that Messianism
is, only it has been transferred to Rome under Gentile
care, complete with its own new set of Gentile
pharisaic law, custom, rites, traditions, etc. This
parallel is too vast to explore further here.