THE PROBLEM OF MESSIANIC JUDAISM
PART 9
THE TRIUMVIRAL SPECTRUM: PAUL, PETER AND JAMES, CONT.
The
year is now circa AD 50-51. It is some dozen years since Peter was led to
Caesarea to witness the Spirit’s unconditional outpouring on the Gentiles; and
also since the interracial church in Antioch was formed where Paul had been
planted.
Since that time, Paul has been at Antioch ministering interracially, making but one brief visit to Jerusalem with Barnabas to bring famine relief, but not seeing Peter who was just being jailed, escapes and then goes into hiding (Acts 12)27
—some 7 years ago (AD 43-44). Shortly after this, the Holy Spirit sends Paul and Barnabas on their mission to Cyprus and Galatia, from which they have returned but 4-5 years ago (AD 45-46). And they have been teaching at Antioch ever since.Meanwhile,
all these years Peter has remained in Jerusalem, hence under the Pharisaic Messianic “cloud.” Except for his brief jailing
about AD 43, the Spirit mentions none of his activities. Possibly he has
traveled locally into Judea, but never into Gentile territory to visit the work
at Antioch which his long-time friend Barnabas has helped pastor all along. But
what we shortly learn is that his lesson in Caesarea, while remaining with him
theoretically, has lost any practical meaning under the cloud.
- The Jerusalem / Antioch Relationship
The
following is an unprovable but very plausible account of the Jerusalem /
Antioch relationship based on the
contextual spiritual evidence. This account helps us understand Peter’s
eventual visit there, his confrontation with Paul and the Jerusalem Council
that partly resulted from it.28
The
Antioch assembly came into being while Peter was on his Judean trip, including
his visit to Cornelius (circ. AD 38). The Messianic Pharisees already held an
intimidating influence over Peter such that he felt compelled to have to “give
account” to them of why he, Yeshua’s own appointed apostle, obeyed the Spirit to
cross racial lines to minister the gospel.
While
Peter is still away and the Pharisees await his “account,” word of Antioch’s
interracial forming comes—a second blow to the Messianic mind. These same
intimidators then send Barnabas to “check it out” and report back, since Peter
is not there to go himself. (James will never leave Jerusalem for any reason.)
So
Barnabas goes and is blessed, but does not return to Jerusalem. That’s because
he doesn’t want to face the same intimidation awaiting Peter, especially
without Peter there. Instead, he goes north to find Saul (Paul). He seeks out
Paul because Barnabas has reason to believe what’s happening in Antioch will
resonate with Paul. This is because while the brothers were escorting Paul out
of Jerusalem two years earlier, Paul dared to confide in Barnabas (but not
Peter) his fresh revelation from Yeshua about his call to the Gentiles.
Paul
returns with Barnabas to Antioch. But Peter, having returned to face the
Pharisees in Jerusalem over the Cornelius matter, is not inclined to venture
now into Gentile territory to verify the Antioch situation. The fact that
Barnabas never returned to report on Antioch is of concern to all. But since
traveling great distances is not the easy thing it is today, and because the
idea of travel into Gentile country at all is psychologically prohibitive, the
Jerusalem Messianics and Peter just decide to “let it go, leave it be, whatever
may come of it,” and stick to their work in Jerusalem.
Years
pass. As Barnabas and Paul minister, news of this travels back also. The church
in Antioch is apparently succeeding (impossible as that might seem to the
Messianics). A few years later, the Antiochans prove their love by sending the
relief offering with Paul and Barnabas. But Peter, being sought by Herod, is
not there to receive it. James is, and given the surrounding pressures with
Herod, nobody has time to talk about what’s been happening at Antioch the last
5 years. Paul and Barnabas return to Antioch.
- Antioch: The
Confrontation Surfaces
On returning to Antioch, the Holy Spirit sends Paul and Barnabas on their first mission trip.29
They then return to Antioch to keep teaching for another 4+ years. News of this trip also eventually reaches Jerusalem—as well as the fact that Antioch keeps thriving. A combination of curiosity and fear grows as clearly the spread of Yeshua’s Name outside Judea is beginning to get “out of control.” During this time, the Messianic Pharisees only increase their influence. Now, in response to the foreign reports, they cement their own viperous doctrine of salvation in Yeshua via submission to Jewish heritage through circumcision.As
perennial man in the middle, pressure mounts on Peter to find out what’s going
on in Antioch. So he musters the fortitude to venture past Israeli territory to
go to Antioch. On arrival, he begins getting acquainted with the work. Mindful
of his lesson in Caesarea 12 years before, he freely associates with the
Gentile believers, especially since no one from Jerusalem can bother him. (What
relief he must have felt in the
freedom of that inter-racial atmosphere.)
Meanwhile,
back in Jerusalem, the Pharisaic Messianics don’t trust Peter. They saw what
happened the last time he left on a significant mission! And they don’t want to
lose him to this new movement the way Barnabas disappeared. Not only this, but
their ultimate motive is to do what Peter will not. They intend to rein in this
movement with their doctrine of salvation via Jewish legal heritage. So with
the assent of James (who is unaware of the doctrine the men plan to bring),
some make their own trip behind Peter, without his knowledge.
Once
the men from James arrive, Peter’s fears are exposed, so he appeasingly sits
with them apart from the Gentiles at a certain dinner. So great is this
imported pharisaic pressure that the other Jews in the assembly are also pulled
into this separation. Even Barnabas, though not so intimidated by the
Pharisees, wants to be close to his long time friend whom he has not seen in so
many years. Meanwhile, in the time between their arrival and this dinner, the
vipers from Jerusalem have begun releasing their heritage salvation doctrine
into the conversations with Antioch believers (though Peter is unaware of
them.)
Paul,
who witnesses this dinner separation and has begun hearing the trickle down of
the conversations, is absolutely incensed. He publicly confronts Peter and the
entire lot with his gospel of race transcendent grace, facing Peter with his own futility under the Law as a Jew.
(Paul did not realize Peter wasn’t personally disseminating the doctrine, so
included him in the charge against it.)
Finally,
the effects of Pharisaic Messianism’s hidden poison have surfaced, and with it,
the gospel formed around Yeshua’s legal Transcendence bursts out of the closet
to be heard by the first Jerusalem apostle. Eighteen years of growing tension
between the Messianics and the Transcendents—since the very first
discrimination issue over widows—openly blazes forth on a single incident. The match has been lit to the keg.
- Road to the
Council of Jerusalem
Stung and embarrassed by his own behavior more than by Paul’s confrontation, and left to mull the implications of what Paul has said, Peter returns quickly to Jerusalem.30
—the situation awaiting closure. Meanwhile, the men from James split up. Some return to Jerusalem. Others leave for Cilicia (and eventually Galatia to track down Paul’s churches) to fight Paul on Paul’s territory—without his knowledge and without authorization from James. Still others remain in Antioch to debate Paul and Barnabas over Jewish heritage salvation. The heat is past words. The war is on.Unable to get their opponents to concede or even budge, the
Antioch church finally determines by revelation that a meeting of the Jerusalem
apostles is necessary to conclusively resolve the issue. In this, Paul’s gospel and his entire work in Galatia
are on the line.
27 There is a very good
possibility that Paul and Barnabas were at the prayer meeting at Barnabas’
sister’s house the night Peter was released!
28 In this account I posit (in
agreement with The Silas Diary by
Gene Edwards) that Peter’s visit to Antioch precedes the Jerusalem Council.
This is based on the progressive development in Peter’s attitude toward the
Pharisees between the two events. It makes more sense that Peter’s ability to
withstand the Pharisees in Jerusalem follows
his fears of them in Antioch, rather than that he is able to withstand them
first on their home territory but not able to later withstand them outside
their territory in Antioch. The same applies to the relationship between his
and Paul’s use of the same words in the debate. Peter uses the same words in
Jerusalem (Ac. 15:11) to fend off the Pharisees that Paul uses against him in
Antioch (Gal. 2:16). Given Peter’s
unstable position between the two camps, it makes more sense that Paul’s
use influences his use, rather than that his use stands first only to later
have his own words thrown back at him by Paul.
29 Yet again, the Holy Spirit is mentioned in connection
with the movement outside Jerusalem. He is never mentioned with regard to the
Jerusalem church again.
30 Again,
with Peter caught in the middle we see the overbearing influence on his
thinking due to the Jerusalem death spirit and the local vipers. And again, one
only asks, where was Peter’s stellar leadership over the years? For based on
his lesson by the Spirit at Caesarea, not only should he have not acted this
way now at Antioch, but there was absolutely no need for this Council! Had the
leadership been there, the unrepentant Pharisees would not only have been
refused sway, they would have been put out of the church! Nevertheless, the
Council proceeds. And Paul will clearly set out his gospel for Peter and James
before hand.